|
Rasterio 1.2.6
Hi all,
If you've been unable to install rasterio in --non-binary mode today, please see https://github.com/mapbox/rasterio/blob/master/CHANGES.txt#L14-L18 for details on the fix in version 1.2.6.
--
Hi all,
If you've been unable to install rasterio in --non-binary mode today, please see https://github.com/mapbox/rasterio/blob/master/CHANGES.txt#L14-L18 for details on the fix in version 1.2.6.
--
|
By
Sean Gillies
·
#791
·
|
|
Re: Rasterio 1.2.5
Hi all,
I messed up the 1.2.5 source distribution (the .tar.gz) and there is a breakpoint set in it. I don't see any better fix than to release a 1.2.6 version later today.
The 1.2.5 wheels are fine.
Hi all,
I messed up the 1.2.5 source distribution (the .tar.gz) and there is a breakpoint set in it. I don't see any better fix than to release a 1.2.6 version later today.
The 1.2.5 wheels are fine.
|
By
Sean Gillies
·
#790
·
|
|
Rasterio 1.2.5
Hi all,
Rasterio 1.2.5 distributions were uploaded to PyPI yesterday evening. Here are the changes: https://github.com/mapbox/rasterio/blob/master/CHANGES.txt#L17-L21.
Thank you for the bug reports
Hi all,
Rasterio 1.2.5 distributions were uploaded to PyPI yesterday evening. Here are the changes: https://github.com/mapbox/rasterio/blob/master/CHANGES.txt#L17-L21.
Thank you for the bug reports
|
By
Sean Gillies
·
#789
·
|
|
Re: Shape of resulting merged image is not what I expect
Hi,
I'm happy report that you won't have this problem with version 1.2.5, which is coming soon to PyPI.
As a part of the work to fix the bug noted at
Hi,
I'm happy report that you won't have this problem with version 1.2.5, which is coming soon to PyPI.
As a part of the work to fix the bug noted at
|
By
Sean Gillies
·
#788
·
|
|
Re: Proposal: Allow other cloud object store providers
Hi,
Thanks for bringing this up! To be sure that I understand, are you proposing that potentially any cloud platform would be made first class in rasterio, concretely, as in GDAL and as with
Hi,
Thanks for bringing this up! To be sure that I understand, are you proposing that potentially any cloud platform would be made first class in rasterio, concretely, as in GDAL and as with
|
By
Sean Gillies
·
#787
·
|
|
Re: How are calculate_default_transform and aligned_target different?
Hi Yon,
The intent is that rasterio.warp.reproject, given the values output from calculate_default_transform, will produce a result close to that of GDAL's gdalwarp utility *without* its "-tap"
Hi Yon,
The intent is that rasterio.warp.reproject, given the values output from calculate_default_transform, will produce a result close to that of GDAL's gdalwarp utility *without* its "-tap"
|
By
Sean Gillies
·
#786
·
|
|
Re: Rasters with mixed dtypes
Hi Amaury,
Sorry for the late reply. Rasterio depends on GDAL and support for mixed data types in that library varies across the different format drivers. GeoTIFF is constrained, but others are not.
Hi Amaury,
Sorry for the late reply. Rasterio depends on GDAL and support for mixed data types in that library varies across the different format drivers. GeoTIFF is constrained, but others are not.
|
By
Sean Gillies
·
#785
·
|
|
Proposal: Allow other cloud object store providers
Hi Everyone,
I understand that AWS S3 is by far the most common cloud object store provider, especially in the geospatial community. Unfortunately some users don't get to choose which object store
Hi Everyone,
I understand that AWS S3 is by far the most common cloud object store provider, especially in the geospatial community. Unfortunately some users don't get to choose which object store
|
By
ashley.sommer@...
·
#784
·
|
|
How are calculate_default_transform and aligned_target different?
Greetings everyone,
I am trying to do reprojection in chunks and have been using rasterio.warp.calculate_default_transform for getting the projected extent and transform of the chunk. However, I
Greetings everyone,
I am trying to do reprojection in chunks and have been using rasterio.warp.calculate_default_transform for getting the projected extent and transform of the chunk. However, I
|
By
yon.davies@...
·
#783
·
|
|
Shape of resulting merged image is not what I expect
I'm not sure if this is a bug or a subtle unexpected behaviour of the function rasterio.merge.merge.
I'm creating a mosaic with several images for the whole globe. The resolution is such that the
I'm not sure if this is a bug or a subtle unexpected behaviour of the function rasterio.merge.merge.
I'm creating a mosaic with several images for the whole globe. The resolution is such that the
|
By
juanjo.gomeznavarro@...
·
#782
·
Edited
|
|
Rasters with mixed dtypes
Hello everyone,
I was wondering if there are any good examples/reasons for having rasters that contain bands with mixed dtypes e.g. ('uint8', 'float32').
This seem to be mostly supported in
Hello everyone,
I was wondering if there are any good examples/reasons for having rasters that contain bands with mixed dtypes e.g. ('uint8', 'float32').
This seem to be mostly supported in
|
By
amaury.dehecq@...
·
#781
·
|
|
Help with inconsistent errors using WarpedVRT/rio_tiler
Hello,
I have been running into some puzzling errors with windowed reads of COGs in Mollweide crs.
The read raises a CPLE_AppDefinedError on transforming the window to the dataset crs the first five
Hello,
I have been running into some puzzling errors with windowed reads of COGs in Mollweide crs.
The read raises a CPLE_AppDefinedError on transforming the window to the dataset crs the first five
|
By
fgassert@...
·
#780
·
|
|
Re: Rasterio 1.2.4
Hi Sean
regarding the change in web mercator, I guess this is due to a subtle change where we don't check anymore if latitude is close enough of PI/2 to decide the point doesn't
Hi Sean
regarding the change in web mercator, I guess this is due to a subtle change where we don't check anymore if latitude is close enough of PI/2 to decide the point doesn't
|
By
Even Rouault
·
#779
·
|
|
Rasterio 1.2.4
Hi all,
Here is the list of bug fixes in rasterio 1.2.4:
https://github.com/mapbox/rasterio/blob/master/CHANGES.txt#L13-L32
The wheels on PyPI for this version now include GDAL 3.3.0 and GEOS 3.9.1.
Hi all,
Here is the list of bug fixes in rasterio 1.2.4:
https://github.com/mapbox/rasterio/blob/master/CHANGES.txt#L13-L32
The wheels on PyPI for this version now include GDAL 3.3.0 and GEOS 3.9.1.
|
By
Sean Gillies
·
#778
·
|
|
Re: What do I need to do to visualize Sentinel-1 data with rasterio?
Thanks, Sebastian!
rasterio.plot.show cannot deal with complex arrays. It looks like a library called mpmath can, might be worth looking in https://mpmath.org/gallery/.--
Sean Gillies
Thanks, Sebastian!
rasterio.plot.show cannot deal with complex arrays. It looks like a library called mpmath can, might be worth looking in https://mpmath.org/gallery/.--
Sean Gillies
|
By
Sean Gillies
·
#777
·
|
|
Re: What do I need to do to visualize Sentinel-1 data with rasterio?
Looks like your data is Single Look Complex (SLC), you'll need to convert it to float. You can do this yourself with numpy, or with https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/derived.html GDAL (which rasterio
Looks like your data is Single Look Complex (SLC), you'll need to convert it to float. You can do this yourself with numpy, or with https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/derived.html GDAL (which rasterio
|
By
Yann-Sebastien Tremblay-Johnston
·
#776
·
|
|
What do I need to do to visualize Sentinel-1 data with rasterio?
I'm a first time user. I downloaded a Sentinel-1 granule. I'm now trying to visualize it via the following script:However this gives me the following error:What else do I need to do?
I'm a first time user. I downloaded a Sentinel-1 granule. I'm now trying to visualize it via the following script:However this gives me the following error:What else do I need to do?
|
By
earthdata@...
·
#775
·
|
|
Re: concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor for s3 COG reads fails - CPLReleaseMutex: Error
Hi Darren,
I've seen this error message before, and opened an issue at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2278. I haven't tried to reproduce the error with GDAL 3.3 yet.
--
Sean Gillies
Hi Darren,
I've seen this error message before, and opened an issue at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/2278. I haven't tried to reproduce the error with GDAL 3.3 yet.
--
Sean Gillies
|
By
Sean Gillies
·
#774
·
|
|
Re: Reconciling transforms by from_origin and from_bounds
rasterio.transform.from_origin(west, north, xsize, ysize)
Return an Affine transformation given upper left and pixel
rasterio.transform.from_origin(west, north, xsize, ysize)
Return an Affine transformation given upper left and pixel
|
By
Luke
·
#773
·
Edited
|
|
Reconciling transforms by from_origin and from_bounds
I am trying to reconcile the transforms that I get by using transform.from_origin and transform.from_bounds
bounds = BoundingBox(left=1679712.0, bottom=5860848.0, right=1862208.0, top=6029312.0)
width
I am trying to reconcile the transforms that I get by using transform.from_origin and transform.from_bounds
bounds = BoundingBox(left=1679712.0, bottom=5860848.0, right=1862208.0, top=6029312.0)
width
|
By
ayr035@...
·
#772
·
|