|
Re: Fast X-array rasterization
So what I am trying to achieve in the end is the same as basic `rasterio.feature.rasterize`, but with more flexible aggregation strategies, like median, mean, percentile and std - currently it
So what I am trying to achieve in the end is the same as basic `rasterio.feature.rasterize`, but with more flexible aggregation strategies, like median, mean, percentile and std - currently it
|
By
Philipp Kats
·
#42
·
|
|
Re: Rasterio 1.0.3.post1
Even,
Thanks for the pointer!
In configuring my GDAL 2.3.1 builds, pkg-config and openjpeg were found:
(full logs here:
Even,
Thanks for the pointer!
In configuring my GDAL 2.3.1 builds, pkg-config and openjpeg were found:
(full logs here:
|
By
Sean Gillies
·
#43
·
|
|
Re: Rasterio 1.0.3.post1
OS: Ubuntu 16.04.5
Wheel: rasterio-1.0.3.post1-cp35-cp35m-manylinux1_x86_64.whl
Full example:
$ pip install -U rasterioCollecting rasterio Using cached
OS: Ubuntu 16.04.5
Wheel: rasterio-1.0.3.post1-cp35-cp35m-manylinux1_x86_64.whl
Full example:
$ pip install -U rasterioCollecting rasterio Using cached
|
By
Denis Rykov
·
#44
·
|
|
Re: Fast X-array rasterization
I'm not entirely sure I follow what you are aiming for here yet. Are you trying to aggregate across features per pixel to calculate various statistics? Like, what is the average feature size of all
I'm not entirely sure I follow what you are aiming for here yet. Are you trying to aggregate across features per pixel to calculate various statistics? Like, what is the average feature size of all
|
By
Brendan Ward
·
#45
·
|
|
Re: Rasterio 1.0.3.post1
Hi Denis,
I discovered that I had to patch GDAL 2.3.1 to build with OpenJPEG for the ancient manylinux1 platform. I've uploaded new wheels with a "-1" build tag to
Hi Denis,
I discovered that I had to patch GDAL 2.3.1 to build with OpenJPEG for the ancient manylinux1 platform. I've uploaded new wheels with a "-1" build tag to
|
By
Sean Gillies
·
#46
·
|
|
Re: Rasterio 1.0.3.post1
Thank you very much, Sean!
Thank you very much, Sean!
|
By
Denis Rykov
·
#47
·
|
|
Re: Fast X-array rasterization
Hi Brendan,
Thanks!
Indeed, that what I am trying to achieve. and your hint to ints is great! In fact, I could boil it down to store binary masks - feature id would be stored in the Z dimension
Hi Brendan,
Thanks!
Indeed, that what I am trying to achieve. and your hint to ints is great! In fact, I could boil it down to store binary masks - feature id would be stored in the Z dimension
|
By
Philipp Kats
·
#48
·
|
|
In-memory multi dataset object
Hi
I wonder if I can create in-memory multi-dataset dataset, something like `gdalbuildvrt` but in memory
The use case I have in mind, is that I have a list of urls some of them construct the same
Hi
I wonder if I can create in-memory multi-dataset dataset, something like `gdalbuildvrt` but in memory
The use case I have in mind, is that I have a list of urls some of them construct the same
|
By
Guy Doulberg
·
#49
·
|
|
Re: In-memory multi dataset object
Hi Guy,
Rasterio doesn't have first-class support for VRTs. I'm not rushing to do it because there are some VRT features that I frankly think are nuts, like embedding Python code.
However, we can use
Hi Guy,
Rasterio doesn't have first-class support for VRTs. I'm not rushing to do it because there are some VRT features that I frankly think are nuts, like embedding Python code.
However, we can use
|
By
Sean Gillies
·
#50
·
|
|
Re: In-memory multi dataset object
Thanks,
בתאריך יום ה׳, 13 בספט׳ 2018, 18:59, מאת Sean Gillies <sean.gillies@...>:
Thanks,
בתאריך יום ה׳, 13 בספט׳ 2018, 18:59, מאת Sean Gillies <sean.gillies@...>:
|
By
Guy Doulberg
·
#51
·
|
|
Rasterio 1.0.5
Hi all,
Rasterio 1.0.5 is on PyPI now. It fixes 3 bugs and provides a source distribution that will be compatible with Python 3.7. From the change log:
Bug fixes:- The fill value for boundless reads
Hi all,
Rasterio 1.0.5 is on PyPI now. It fixes 3 bugs and provides a source distribution that will be compatible with Python 3.7. From the change log:
Bug fixes:- The fill value for boundless reads
|
By
Sean Gillies
·
#52
·
|
|
Rasterio 1.0.6
Hi all,
Rasterio 1.0.6 is on PyPI now with 3 significant bug fixes:
- If the build_overviews method of a dataset is passed a list of factors that specify more than one 1x1 pixel overview (#1333),
Hi all,
Rasterio 1.0.6 is on PyPI now with 3 significant bug fixes:
- If the build_overviews method of a dataset is passed a list of factors that specify more than one 1x1 pixel overview (#1333),
|
By
Sean Gillies
·
#53
·
|
|
Click 7.0 breaks Rasterio
Hi all,
Heads up: click 7.0 was released to PyPI yesterday and rasterio is not compatible with it. If you pin `click==6.7` in your applications, you'll be fine. The change log entry for 7 is looong
Hi all,
Heads up: click 7.0 was released to PyPI yesterday and rasterio is not compatible with it. If you pin `click==6.7` in your applications, you'll be fine. The change log entry for 7 is looong
|
By
Sean Gillies
·
#54
·
|
|
Re: Click 7.0 breaks Rasterio
I bet the subcommand remame from underscore to dash will break a lot.
I bet the subcommand remame from underscore to dash will break a lot.
|
By
Alan Snow
·
#55
·
|
|
Re: Click 7.0 breaks Rasterio
It turns out that the culprit is the cligj package. I'm uploading a new release to PyPI now.
--
Sean Gillies
It turns out that the culprit is the cligj package. I'm uploading a new release to PyPI now.
--
Sean Gillies
|
By
Sean Gillies
·
#56
·
|
|
Please upgrade cligj to 0.5
Hi all,
A rasterio dependency, cligj 0.4.0, is not compatible with click 7 (released yesterday) and if click has been upgraded in your environment you will notice that the rio commands are broken.
Hi all,
A rasterio dependency, cligj 0.4.0, is not compatible with click 7 (released yesterday) and if click has been upgraded in your environment you will notice that the rio commands are broken.
|
By
Sean Gillies
·
#57
·
|
|
Rasterio 1.0.7
Hi all,
Rasterio 1.0.7 is compatible with click versions >= 4 and < 8 (not released yet, of course) including the new click version 7.0, and fixes a couple other small bugs as well. Please upgrade
Hi all,
Rasterio 1.0.7 is compatible with click versions >= 4 and < 8 (not released yet, of course) including the new click version 7.0, and fixes a couple other small bugs as well. Please upgrade
|
By
Sean Gillies
·
#58
·
|
|
Rasterio 1.0.3 and Python 3.4
Hello folks,
I have problems with installation rasterio==1.0.3 and higher on Python 3.4. There are no problems with 3.5 and 3.6.
Is it an expected behavior?
$ sudo docker run --name python34 -it
Hello folks,
I have problems with installation rasterio==1.0.3 and higher on Python 3.4. There are no problems with 3.5 and 3.6.
Is it an expected behavior?
$ sudo docker run --name python34 -it
|
By
Denis Rykov
·
#59
·
Edited
|
|
Re: Rasterio 1.0.3 and Python 3.4
There is no Linux wheel for Python 3.4 here: https://pypi.org/project/rasterio/#files
There is no Linux wheel for Python 3.4 here: https://pypi.org/project/rasterio/#files
|
By
Denis Rykov
·
#60
·
|
|
Re: Rasterio 1.0.3 and Python 3.4
Hi Denis,
Since we switched over to making wheels using the multibuild project we're blocked from releasing *well tested* Python 3.4 linux wheels by (my hypothesis) bugs in trusty's python 3.4.3. The
Hi Denis,
Since we switched over to making wheels using the multibuild project we're blocked from releasing *well tested* Python 3.4 linux wheels by (my hypothesis) bugs in trusty's python 3.4.3. The
|
By
Sean Gillies
·
#61
·
|